Pure genius. Remind you of anything, Ben Stein fans?
|
||||||
|
Pure genius. Remind you of anything, Ben Stein fans? Since the internet exploded with a sudden wave of nostalgia for Corey Haim after he OD’d, I’ve had this little problem. See, he used to be a child actor in Canada before he broke into Hollywood, and one of the shows he acted in was one of my favorites as a kid. And ever since the news struck of his demise, I can’t get the theme song out of my damn head. And now neither can you. Whoever tweeted this earlier today, this was epic. And vulgar. And brilliant. Oh, and probably not safe for work. Or for anyone that hates blasphemy. This article is absolutely unfathomable. I’m trying to find some way to blame Bill Clinton and his “definition of ‘is’”, but it goes well beyond that. WELL beyond.
The only explanation for people not considering penis-in-vagina to “count” as sex, that I can think of, is education. Without teaching people what counts as sexual intercourse, STD infections are probably most rampant in segments of the population where people aren’t properly informed. The question and answer periods are always so awkward, so neither Jodi nor I really felt the need to watch them, but the debate itself was rather one-sided. Of course it always seems that way — theists always think their side handily won any such debate, while atheists likewise think the same thing. My reasoning for calling it one-sided is insofar as Barker actually adequately answered Deen’s claims (though not, as Deen seemed to think he should have, during the opening speech), while Deen did nothing of the sort, merely constructing several incorrect assumptions about Barker’s worldview. I’ve noticed that quite often during debates — the theist side will make several claims about the atheist’s worldview in particular, even going so far as to outright refuse to acknowledge the atheist’s self-definition. I can’t recall a debate where an atheist tells a theist what the theist believes — only that their reason for believing what they claim to believe is wrong. Jon Stewart pretty much “exposes” Chat Roulette for exactly what it is: a part of the internet. Which is for porn. Why this is such a big media story, I have no clue. Pardon the framing story, I can’t embed the clip directly from The Comedy Channel and I can’t see Comedy Central in Canuckistan. Human beings are fallible. They make mistakes. They are imperfect. Put solitary humans in positions where they are held to be paragons of virtue, where they are the arbiters of what is moral and what isn’t, and there will be systemic abuses. This hearkens back to the old saw, “power corrupts.” However, some folks who are elevated to positions of power are already corrupt — sometimes they believe they are fighting their own corruption by claiming a life of virtue, sometimes they aren’t even aware of how immoral their personal codes are. That religious folks are held as having a higher standard of morality is galling. I recently got into a discussion with a coworker about a person I hardly knew at all, where that person’s moral compass was in question. My coworker defended this person with, “oh, but he’s very religious, he’d never do such a thing.” I couldn’t resist scoffing. Not after seeing headline after headline where religious people, held up as moral paragons, are in fact as shiftless and corrupt as any other human being. In my Too Many Tabs list, there’s a bunch of links I have not yet mentioned in any previous RCimT wherein a religious figure does something grossly immoral. They wouldn’t have been as big of news if the person in question wasn’t in a position of religious power, either. If they had been ordinary citizens, it might still have been news, but the outrage wouldn’t have been nearly as amplified. I guess adding a charge of hypocrisy on top of whatever existing charges they’ve accumulated, just redoubles the gravity of their crimes. Links below the fold. It’s a short debate, but it’s nice to see someone in the media like Joy Behar asking the religious figures tough questions too. |
||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 Lousy Canuck - All Rights Reserved |
||||||
Recent Comments